Academic cheating is currently an epidemic on the campus of Harvard University. In a recent article published by the Washington Post (When ambition trumps ethics), it was cited that over half of the 250 undergraduates in a course named “Introduction to Congress” cheated on a final exam. Within the article and cited below, Harvard professor Howard Gardner offers some explanations by the observations in his students. As you read below, please keep in mind that our secular universities tout that there is no objective truth and postmodernism controls those campuses, both in faculty and students. The ideal philosophy of “the ends justify the means” is simply a logical conclusion to the indoctrination of our students in deconstructionism within higher education. If you disagree with me, please read Howard Gardner’s observations and witness how the relativistic thinking of the day permeates the culture of our universities. This culture of cheating from professors and translated to students does not arrive overnight, but is an obvious and logical conclusion found in our country’s oldest institution of higher learning that originally trained Puritan ministers in the objective truths found in the Bible.
Over and over again, students told us that they admired good work and wanted to be good workers. But they also told us they wanted — ardently — to be successful. They feared that their peers were cutting corners and that if they themselves behaved ethically, they would be bested. And so, they told us in effect, “Let us cut corners now and one day, when we have achieved fame and fortune, we’ll be good workers and set a good example.” A classic case of the ends justify the means.
We were so concerned by the results that, for the past six years, we have conducted reflection sessions at elite colleges, including Harvard. Again, we have found the students to be articulate, thoughtful, even lovable. Yet over and over again, we have also found hollowness at the core.
Two examples: In discussing the firing of a dean who lied about her academic qualifications, no student supported the firing. The most common responses were “She’s doing a good job, what’s the problem?” and “Everyone lies on their résumé.” In a discussion of the documentary “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room,” students were asked what they thought of the company traders who manipulated the price of energy. No student condemned the traders; responses varied from caveat emptor to saying it’s the job of the governor or the state assembly to monitor the situation.
One clue to the troubling state of affairs came from a Harvard classmate who asked me: “Howard, don’t you realize that Harvard has always been primarily about one thing — success?” The students admitted to Harvard these days have watched their every step, lest they fail in their goal of admission to an elite school. But once admitted, they begin to look for new goals, and being a successful scholar is usually not high on the list. What is admired is success on Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Hollywood — a lavish lifestyle that, among other things, allows you to support your alma mater and get the recognition that follows.
As for those students who do have the scholarly bent, all too often they see professors cut corners — in their class attendance, their attention to student work and, most flagrantly, their use of others to do research. Most embarrassingly, when professors are caught — whether in financial misdealings or even plagiarizing others’ work — there are frequently no clear punishments. If punishments ensue, they are kept quiet, and no one learns the lessons that need to be learned.
Whatever happens to those guilty of cheating, many admirable people are likely to be tarred by their association with Harvard.